<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 893 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the expenses were for CSR, not capital in nature, and were wholly and exclusively for business purposes, thus allowable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance was deemed unwarranted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 893 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the expenses were for CSR, not capital in nature, and were wholly and exclusively for business purposes, thus allowable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance was deemed unwarranted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>