<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 876 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362049</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the appellant&#039;s right to Cenvat credit on service tax for maintenance and repair services, citing a previous Tribunal order in the same assessee&#039;s case that favored the appellant. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected due to their failure to effectively challenge the earlier Tribunal decision, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant based on judicial discipline and the binding nature of previous Tribunal rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:27:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 876 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362049</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the appellant&#039;s right to Cenvat credit on service tax for maintenance and repair services, citing a previous Tribunal order in the same assessee&#039;s case that favored the appellant. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected due to their failure to effectively challenge the earlier Tribunal decision, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant based on judicial discipline and the binding nature of previous Tribunal rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>