<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 875 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362048</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants as the denial of service tax credit based on photocopies of invoices was overturned. The Member (Judicial) emphasized that the credit should not be denied solely on the basis of photocopies when the services were duly paid for and utilized in manufacturing activities. The legal requirement of original invoices was considered procedural, and as the appellants met other substantive conditions, the denial was deemed unjustified. The decision referenced previous judgments supporting this interpretation and highlighted the importance of focusing on substantial compliance over procedural formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 875 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362048</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants as the denial of service tax credit based on photocopies of invoices was overturned. The Member (Judicial) emphasized that the credit should not be denied solely on the basis of photocopies when the services were duly paid for and utilized in manufacturing activities. The legal requirement of original invoices was considered procedural, and as the appellants met other substantive conditions, the denial was deemed unjustified. The decision referenced previous judgments supporting this interpretation and highlighted the importance of focusing on substantial compliance over procedural formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>