<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 102 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13395</link>
    <description>Reassessment under the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act was upheld where the original assessment had been made on an incorrect accounting basis and the statute permitted correction of escaped income within the prescribed period. The court noted that a wrong citation of the enabling provision did not invalidate the reassessment if jurisdiction otherwise existed and no procedural defect was shown. On switchover from compounding to regular assessment, opening stock from crop sold in the previous year was taxable under the method of accounting regularly employed, because the compounding scheme did not create an implied exemption or require exclusion of that stock from the later regular assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:44:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 102 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13395</link>
      <description>Reassessment under the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act was upheld where the original assessment had been made on an incorrect accounting basis and the statute permitted correction of escaped income within the prescribed period. The court noted that a wrong citation of the enabling provision did not invalidate the reassessment if jurisdiction otherwise existed and no procedural defect was shown. On switchover from compounding to regular assessment, opening stock from crop sold in the previous year was taxable under the method of accounting regularly employed, because the compounding scheme did not create an implied exemption or require exclusion of that stock from the later regular assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>