<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 192 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13394</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was invalid. The court found no failure by the petitioner to disclose material facts, rendering the reassessment proceedings beyond four years impermissible. Consequently, the notice and subsequent order were quashed, and costs were awarded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 192 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13394</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was invalid. The court found no failure by the petitioner to disclose material facts, rendering the reassessment proceedings beyond four years impermissible. Consequently, the notice and subsequent order were quashed, and costs were awarded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>