<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 864 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original denying the adjustment of excise duty for the disputed period from November 2010 to December 2015. The Tribunal emphasized the application of CAS-4 for valuation and costing, ruling that duty liability should be determined on an annual basis for inter-unit transfers. It allowed the appeal, highlighting the need to adjust duty paid based on annual costing and relying on previous decisions to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:25:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 864 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original denying the adjustment of excise duty for the disputed period from November 2010 to December 2015. The Tribunal emphasized the application of CAS-4 for valuation and costing, ruling that duty liability should be determined on an annual basis for inter-unit transfers. It allowed the appeal, highlighting the need to adjust duty paid based on annual costing and relying on previous decisions to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>