https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362029 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's activities fell within the definition of Business Auxiliary Service. The tribunal found the demand for tax liability valid, as the appellant failed to pay service tax despite registration and willful suppression of information. The decision was made on 10.05.2018. en-us Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:24:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362029 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's activities fell within the definition of Business Auxiliary Service. The tribunal found the demand for tax liability valid, as the appellant failed to pay service tax despite registration and willful suppression of information. The decision was made on 10.05.2018. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 10 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362029