<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 94 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13392</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for lack of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer. The court found no substantial question of law, emphasizing the necessity for proper application of mind and satisfaction recording. Each party bore their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 94 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13392</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for lack of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer. The court found no substantial question of law, emphasizing the necessity for proper application of mind and satisfaction recording. Each party bore their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>