<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1199 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273336</link>
    <description>The levy under the Finance Act applies only to taxable service and does not extend to goods used in executing a composite supply and installation contract for fire safety systems. The text distinguishes the goods component from the service component in a works contract and states that attempting to tax the goods portion was impermissible. On that basis, the goods used in execution were not liable to service tax, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:21:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=524008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1199 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273336</link>
      <description>The levy under the Finance Act applies only to taxable service and does not extend to goods used in executing a composite supply and installation contract for fire safety systems. The text distinguishes the goods component from the service component in a works contract and states that attempting to tax the goods portion was impermissible. On that basis, the goods used in execution were not liable to service tax, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>