<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Disallowances under section 37 case laws</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113878</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 37 turns on whether employee training costs are revenue deductible or capital in nature; recurring or skill-maintenance expenses lean toward revenue treatment, while training conferring enduring benefits or creating capital-like advantages is treated as capital and disallowed. The essential question is application of judicial criteria distinguishing capital from revenue character for training expenditures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:29:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Disallowances under section 37 case laws</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113878</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 37 turns on whether employee training costs are revenue deductible or capital in nature; recurring or skill-maintenance expenses lean toward revenue treatment, while training conferring enduring benefits or creating capital-like advantages is treated as capital and disallowed. The essential question is application of judicial criteria distinguishing capital from revenue character for training expenditures.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:29:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=113878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>