<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 840 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362013</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ appeal, setting aside the single judge&#039;s order and quashing the notice issued by the Revenue under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the notice, which raised new issues beyond the originally disallowed interest, was not a &#039;Change of Opinion&#039; and was time-barred as it was issued after the two-year limitation period from the original assessment date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 840 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362013</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ appeal, setting aside the single judge&#039;s order and quashing the notice issued by the Revenue under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the notice, which raised new issues beyond the originally disallowed interest, was not a &#039;Change of Opinion&#039; and was time-barred as it was issued after the two-year limitation period from the original assessment date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>