<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362003</link>
    <description>Primary agricultural credit societies registered and classified under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act remained eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, despite section 80P(4), where their statutory status placed them within the protected category. The Tribunal treated the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as controlling and distinguished Citizens Co-operative Society Ltd. on facts, noting that the latter involved nominal members treated as non-members. It also held that the Assessing Officer could not disregard the competent authority&#039;s classification, and that the Banking Regulation Act did not apply in the manner urged by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362003</link>
      <description>Primary agricultural credit societies registered and classified under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act remained eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, despite section 80P(4), where their statutory status placed them within the protected category. The Tribunal treated the jurisdictional High Court ruling in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as controlling and distinguished Citizens Co-operative Society Ltd. on facts, noting that the latter involved nominal members treated as non-members. It also held that the Assessing Officer could not disregard the competent authority&#039;s classification, and that the Banking Regulation Act did not apply in the manner urged by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=362003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>