https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361994 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the appellant liable for duty, interest, and penalties due to intentional misdeclaration of goods to evade customs duty. The appellant's failure to comply with Tribunal directions, reliance on retracted statements, and discrepancies in goods ordered and received were not substantiated. Allegations of undervaluation and misdeclaration were upheld, emphasizing the importance of observing principles of natural justice and accurate declaration of imported goods. en-us Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:13:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361994 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the appellant liable for duty, interest, and penalties due to intentional misdeclaration of goods to evade customs duty. The appellant's failure to comply with Tribunal directions, reliance on retracted statements, and discrepancies in goods ordered and received were not substantiated. Allegations of undervaluation and misdeclaration were upheld, emphasizing the importance of observing principles of natural justice and accurate declaration of imported goods. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361994