<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 818 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) from Rs. 3,74,786 to the original amount of Rs. 8,500. The Tribunal recognized the appellant&#039;s good faith in seeking permission for reprocessing and export, emphasizing the minor nature of the defect in some goods. It balanced enforcement with the appellant&#039;s financial difficulties and stressed the significance of compliance with export regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:13:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 818 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) from Rs. 3,74,786 to the original amount of Rs. 8,500. The Tribunal recognized the appellant&#039;s good faith in seeking permission for reprocessing and export, emphasizing the minor nature of the defect in some goods. It balanced enforcement with the appellant&#039;s financial difficulties and stressed the significance of compliance with export regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>