<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 815 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361988</link>
    <description>Trustees alleged to be in charge of a trust&#039;s affairs may be proceeded against for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the complaint contains prima facie averments of responsibility and no material is produced to displace them; the challenge on that ground failed. A complaint based on dishonoured cheques was also held to be within limitation where statutory notices were issued within time after dishonour and the complaint was filed within the prescribed period; the limitation objection failed. On both grounds, the Section 138 proceedings were treated as sustainable and the request to quash them was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:12:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 815 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361988</link>
      <description>Trustees alleged to be in charge of a trust&#039;s affairs may be proceeded against for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the complaint contains prima facie averments of responsibility and no material is produced to displace them; the challenge on that ground failed. A complaint based on dishonoured cheques was also held to be within limitation where statutory notices were issued within time after dishonour and the complaint was filed within the prescribed period; the limitation objection failed. On both grounds, the Section 138 proceedings were treated as sustainable and the request to quash them was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>