<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 813 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Service Tax liability of approximately &amp;amp;8377; 57 Lakhs, but allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for &amp;amp;8377; 1.2 Lakhs due to a reduced tax rate. However, the claim of &amp;amp;8377; 5 Lakhs was rejected as the appellant failed to declare commission amounts received, supported by forensic evidence and admission. The impugned order was upheld except for the relief granted on the reduced tax rate claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:11:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 813 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Service Tax liability of approximately &amp;amp;8377; 57 Lakhs, but allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for &amp;amp;8377; 1.2 Lakhs due to a reduced tax rate. However, the claim of &amp;amp;8377; 5 Lakhs was rejected as the appellant failed to declare commission amounts received, supported by forensic evidence and admission. The impugned order was upheld except for the relief granted on the reduced tax rate claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>