<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 810 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361983</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the co-owners, holding that each co-owner should be individually assessed for service tax based on their rental income. It emphasized treating co-owners separately for tax purposes and upheld the applicability of the SSI exemption Notification to individual owners. The Tribunal rejected the clubbing of rental income for service tax liability assessment, allowing the co-owners to avail of the SSI exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 810 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361983</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the co-owners, holding that each co-owner should be individually assessed for service tax based on their rental income. It emphasized treating co-owners separately for tax purposes and upheld the applicability of the SSI exemption Notification to individual owners. The Tribunal rejected the clubbing of rental income for service tax liability assessment, allowing the co-owners to avail of the SSI exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>