<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 211 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13383</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals concerning the addition of Rs. 1,74,58,165 for alleged discrepancies in production records of tin containers. The court affirmed that no substantial question of law arose, as the production records were accurately maintained, and there was no unaccounted sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 211 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13383</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals concerning the addition of Rs. 1,74,58,165 for alleged discrepancies in production records of tin containers. The court affirmed that no substantial question of law arose, as the production records were accurately maintained, and there was no unaccounted sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>