<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 794 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of Service Tax under both Real Estate Agent Services and Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service. The judgment emphasized the need to carefully assess the services rendered and the relationships established to ascertain the correct application of Service Tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 794 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of Service Tax under both Real Estate Agent Services and Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service. The judgment emphasized the need to carefully assess the services rendered and the relationships established to ascertain the correct application of Service Tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>