<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 791 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361964</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal clarified that service tax liability does not extend to services provided to other advertising agencies, upheld penalties for services provided directly to clients and government agencies, and set aside penalties imposed on the appellants due to genuine confusion. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order to waive penalties under Section 78 and uphold demands for services provided directly to clients and government agencies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 791 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361964</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal clarified that service tax liability does not extend to services provided to other advertising agencies, upheld penalties for services provided directly to clients and government agencies, and set aside penalties imposed on the appellants due to genuine confusion. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the order to waive penalties under Section 78 and uphold demands for services provided directly to clients and government agencies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>