<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 773 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361946</link>
    <description>Strict compliance is required under a concessional duty scheme for permission, utilisation and export of duty-free goods, and a breach going to the substance of those conditions cannot be treated as a mere procedural lapse. Here, goods were exported before the required permission and annexure were issued, and the procurement and use of excisable inputs were not shown to conform to the prescribed scheme. Authorities on condonation of procedural irregularities were distinguished because they did not cover substantive breach of mandatory conditions. The notification benefit was therefore not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:09:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 773 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361946</link>
      <description>Strict compliance is required under a concessional duty scheme for permission, utilisation and export of duty-free goods, and a breach going to the substance of those conditions cannot be treated as a mere procedural lapse. Here, goods were exported before the required permission and annexure were issued, and the procurement and use of excisable inputs were not shown to conform to the prescribed scheme. Authorities on condonation of procedural irregularities were distinguished because they did not cover substantive breach of mandatory conditions. The notification benefit was therefore not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>