https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361942 The demand for excise duty on damaged/defective moulds cleared for reprocessing and remaking under Rule 4(5)(a) was found unwarranted by the Member (Judicial). The clearance of such moulds after use was deemed to be covered by the rule, as it constituted the removal of inputs for further processing by the job worker. Citing precedent and settled law, the Member overturned the impugned order, allowing the appeals and setting aside the excise duty demand. en-us Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:09:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361942 The demand for excise duty on damaged/defective moulds cleared for reprocessing and remaking under Rule 4(5)(a) was found unwarranted by the Member (Judicial). The clearance of such moulds after use was deemed to be covered by the rule, as it constituted the removal of inputs for further processing by the job worker. Citing precedent and settled law, the Member overturned the impugned order, allowing the appeals and setting aside the excise duty demand. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361942