<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 767 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361940</link>
    <description>Diluting imported rust preventive coating with ethanol and mineral spirit, then packing it in drums or cans for industrial buyers, did not amount to deemed manufacture under Chapter Note 9 of Chapter 38. The product retained its essential functional character, the goods were supplied in both imported and diluted form depending on customer requirement, and the packing was industrial or bulk packing rather than retail packing. Mere addition of solvents was insufficient to constitute a process rendering the product marketable as contemplated by the note. The later substitution of &quot;or&quot; for &quot;and&quot; in the chapter note did not change the position for the period in dispute, so the excise duty demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:09:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 767 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361940</link>
      <description>Diluting imported rust preventive coating with ethanol and mineral spirit, then packing it in drums or cans for industrial buyers, did not amount to deemed manufacture under Chapter Note 9 of Chapter 38. The product retained its essential functional character, the goods were supplied in both imported and diluted form depending on customer requirement, and the packing was industrial or bulk packing rather than retail packing. Mere addition of solvents was insufficient to constitute a process rendering the product marketable as contemplated by the note. The later substitution of &quot;or&quot; for &quot;and&quot; in the chapter note did not change the position for the period in dispute, so the excise duty demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>