<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 759 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361932</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the writ appeal regarding the release of seized gold jewelry, emphasizing that interim orders merge with the final decision. The court held that no further adjudication was necessary as the interim order had merged with the final decision in the main case. Referring to legal precedents, the court highlighted that interim orders stand reversed if the final decision goes against the party successful at the interim stage. Therefore, the court concluded that the writ appeal was dismissed without costs, reaffirming that interim orders do not conclusively determine parties&#039; fate in litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 759 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361932</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the writ appeal regarding the release of seized gold jewelry, emphasizing that interim orders merge with the final decision. The court held that no further adjudication was necessary as the interim order had merged with the final decision in the main case. Referring to legal precedents, the court highlighted that interim orders stand reversed if the final decision goes against the party successful at the interim stage. Therefore, the court concluded that the writ appeal was dismissed without costs, reaffirming that interim orders do not conclusively determine parties&#039; fate in litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>