<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 755 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty of Rs. 11,89,710/- was deemed invalid due to a defective show cause notice that did not specify the exact charge against the assessee. The Tribunal applied the principle favoring the assessee when faced with ambiguity, leading to the cancellation of the penalty upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 755 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty of Rs. 11,89,710/- was deemed invalid due to a defective show cause notice that did not specify the exact charge against the assessee. The Tribunal applied the principle favoring the assessee when faced with ambiguity, leading to the cancellation of the penalty upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>