<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Not a Clearing and Forwarding Agent Despite Logistics Role, Court Rules No Principal-Agent Relationship Exists.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39964</link>
    <description>Classification of Services - Though they have been entrusted with the responsibility of receiving the goods at railway siding and storing the same in the godown as also loading of the same onto the truck, it cannot be said that the appellant has acted as agent of the principal–least of all as a C &amp; F Agent of the principal - cannot be said to have acted as C &amp; F Agent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:54:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Not a Clearing and Forwarding Agent Despite Logistics Role, Court Rules No Principal-Agent Relationship Exists.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39964</link>
      <description>Classification of Services - Though they have been entrusted with the responsibility of receiving the goods at railway siding and storing the same in the godown as also loading of the same onto the truck, it cannot be said that the appellant has acted as agent of the principal–least of all as a C &amp; F Agent of the principal - cannot be said to have acted as C &amp; F Agent.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:54:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>