<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 726 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361899</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the sale and purchase of SIM cards, recharge coupons, and starter packs by the appellants did not amount to Business Auxiliary Service attracting service tax. Relying on precedents and emphasizing the payment of VAT on the products, the Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on recharge vouchers. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:50:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 726 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361899</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the sale and purchase of SIM cards, recharge coupons, and starter packs by the appellants did not amount to Business Auxiliary Service attracting service tax. Relying on precedents and emphasizing the payment of VAT on the products, the Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on recharge vouchers. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>