https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361886 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax on management consultancy services provided by the appellant, amounting to &8377;23,076. However, the penalty under section 78 was set aside due to the appellant's misunderstanding about the taxability of the charges. The Tribunal considered the appellant's declaration in their accounts but found the penalty unwarranted. The appeal was partly allowed without altering the duty amount or interest, granting consequential reliefs if any. The Tribunal also allowed a Miscellaneous Application by the department to amend the Cause Title, finalizing the decision on the service tax liability issue. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:50:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361886 The Tribunal confirmed the demand for service tax on management consultancy services provided by the appellant, amounting to &8377;23,076. However, the penalty under section 78 was set aside due to the appellant's misunderstanding about the taxability of the charges. The Tribunal considered the appellant's declaration in their accounts but found the penalty unwarranted. The appeal was partly allowed without altering the duty amount or interest, granting consequential reliefs if any. The Tribunal also allowed a Miscellaneous Application by the department to amend the Cause Title, finalizing the decision on the service tax liability issue. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361886