https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361883 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that they were eligible for abatement under Notification No.1/2006 even though they had reversed the credit without paying interest. The tribunal found that the appellant's actions aligned with previous judgments and that no interest was payable on the reversed credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any, establishing a legal precedent for similar cases. en-us Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:50:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361883 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that they were eligible for abatement under Notification No.1/2006 even though they had reversed the credit without paying interest. The tribunal found that the appellant's actions aligned with previous judgments and that no interest was payable on the reversed credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any, establishing a legal precedent for similar cases. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361883