https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361881 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, concluding that transaction charges reimbursed by customers were not subject to service tax as they were not considered part of the services provided by the appellant. The tribunal rejected the application of Rule 5 of the Service Tax Rules, 2006, emphasizing that the charges were meant for clients to pay to the stock exchange for their transactions and not for services rendered by the appellant. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and penalties, granting relief to the appellant. en-us Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:49:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361881 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, concluding that transaction charges reimbursed by customers were not subject to service tax as they were not considered part of the services provided by the appellant. The tribunal rejected the application of Rule 5 of the Service Tax Rules, 2006, emphasizing that the charges were meant for clients to pay to the stock exchange for their transactions and not for services rendered by the appellant. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and penalties, granting relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361881