<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 707 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for duty based on the inclusion of free issue materials in the assessable value of the wooden crates was not valid. The decision was supported by legal precedents and established principles regarding the treatment of free issue materials in the valuation of manufactured goods. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2018 10:49:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 707 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for duty based on the inclusion of free issue materials in the assessable value of the wooden crates was not valid. The decision was supported by legal precedents and established principles regarding the treatment of free issue materials in the valuation of manufactured goods. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>