<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1145 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the reopening of assessment under Section 148 invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of independent assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the addition of Rs. 11,25,000 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68, as the primary issue&#039;s resolution made it unnecessary to consider the merits of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:11:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1145 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the reopening of assessment under Section 148 invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of independent assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal did not address the addition of Rs. 11,25,000 as unexplained cash credit under Section 68, as the primary issue&#039;s resolution made it unnecessary to consider the merits of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>