https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273300 The Privy Council affirmed that the deposit amount in a joint account belonged to the estate of the deceased depositor, Teku Ram, and not solely to his widow, Musammat Gujri. The court held that there was no presumption of an intended advancement to the widow, ruling in favor of the estate. The appeal was dismissed, and a declaration was made confirming the ownership of the deposit. Additionally, the court addressed the issue of partial partition of the estate, deferring further property division decisions for future resolution. en-us Tue, 24 Apr 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:39:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273300 The Privy Council affirmed that the deposit amount in a joint account belonged to the estate of the deceased depositor, Teku Ram, and not solely to his widow, Musammat Gujri. The court held that there was no presumption of an intended advancement to the widow, ruling in favor of the estate. The appeal was dismissed, and a declaration was made confirming the ownership of the deposit. Additionally, the court addressed the issue of partial partition of the estate, deferring further property division decisions for future resolution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Apr 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273300