<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 692 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361865</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against an order under Sec.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding disallowance under section 14A. The appellant contested the disallowance, arguing investments in group companies were strategic, not for exempt income. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, but the Tribunal found the Assessing Officer failed to satisfy statutory requirements, deleting the disallowance. The Tribunal also ruled that enhancing book profit under section 115JB due to the disallowance was impermissible, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 692 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361865</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against an order under Sec.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding disallowance under section 14A. The appellant contested the disallowance, arguing investments in group companies were strategic, not for exempt income. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, but the Tribunal found the Assessing Officer failed to satisfy statutory requirements, deleting the disallowance. The Tribunal also ruled that enhancing book profit under section 115JB due to the disallowance was impermissible, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>