<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 687 - THE NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361860</link>
    <description>The SC reviewed a GST taxation dispute involving lift equipment. The DGSG investigated allegations of double taxation and found no substantive violation of CGST Act, 2017 provisions. After the Applicant acknowledged misunderstanding tax regulations and requested withdrawal, the Authority accepted the investigation report and dropped proceedings without finding any legal infringement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 687 - THE NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361860</link>
      <description>The SC reviewed a GST taxation dispute involving lift equipment. The DGSG investigated allegations of double taxation and found no substantive violation of CGST Act, 2017 provisions. After the Applicant acknowledged misunderstanding tax regulations and requested withdrawal, the Authority accepted the investigation report and dropped proceedings without finding any legal infringement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>