<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 660 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax before 1.6.2007 based on a Supreme Court judgment. For the period after 1.6.2007, the Tribunal recognized the classification issue and allowed the appellant to pay service tax under the composition scheme, setting aside penalties. The impugned order was modified accordingly, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:30:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 660 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax before 1.6.2007 based on a Supreme Court judgment. For the period after 1.6.2007, the Tribunal recognized the classification issue and allowed the appellant to pay service tax under the composition scheme, setting aside penalties. The impugned order was modified accordingly, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>