https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361829 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling it maintainable despite statutory remedy availability. It determined the time limits in the regulations as directory, not mandatory, and found the show-cause notice timely. The impugned order was deemed within jurisdiction, and referencing the 2013 Regulations did not invalidate it. No relief was granted to the petitioner, and the writ petition was dismissed with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361829 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling it maintainable despite statutory remedy availability. It determined the time limits in the regulations as directory, not mandatory, and found the show-cause notice timely. The impugned order was deemed within jurisdiction, and referencing the 2013 Regulations did not invalidate it. No relief was granted to the petitioner, and the writ petition was dismissed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361829