<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 118 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13351</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering the deletion of the estimated addition in the sale consideration. The court found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions regarding the income from undisclosed sources and the description of the property in the sale deed. It emphasized the lack of substantial evidence to support the Assessing Officer&#039;s decisions and agreed with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and Tribunal&#039;s findings. The court also highlighted the lack of justification for increasing the sale consideration by 8 per cent and dismissed the appellant&#039;s claims of perversity in the assessing authority&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 118 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13351</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering the deletion of the estimated addition in the sale consideration. The court found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions regarding the income from undisclosed sources and the description of the property in the sale deed. It emphasized the lack of substantial evidence to support the Assessing Officer&#039;s decisions and agreed with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and Tribunal&#039;s findings. The court also highlighted the lack of justification for increasing the sale consideration by 8 per cent and dismissed the appellant&#039;s claims of perversity in the assessing authority&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>