https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361813 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the rejection of their excise duty refund claim. The Commissioner (Appeals-II) and Tribunal found that the appellant failed to provide substantial evidence to support their claim, including proper documentation and adherence to statutory procedures. Despite the appellant's arguments, the lack of concrete proof regarding the retention of goods and delayed notification of cancelled export led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following procedural requirements and providing tangible evidence to substantiate refund claims, ultimately upholding the decisions of the lower authorities. en-us Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jun 2018 07:54:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361813 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the rejection of their excise duty refund claim. The Commissioner (Appeals-II) and Tribunal found that the appellant failed to provide substantial evidence to support their claim, including proper documentation and adherence to statutory procedures. Despite the appellant's arguments, the lack of concrete proof regarding the retention of goods and delayed notification of cancelled export led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following procedural requirements and providing tangible evidence to substantiate refund claims, ultimately upholding the decisions of the lower authorities. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361813