<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 633 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the contested demands and penalties. The only confirmed demand was Rs. 5,16,960/-, which the appellant had not contested. The decision emphasized the need for substantial evidence and proper investigation before drawing adverse inferences. The appellants were entitled to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 07:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 633 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the contested demands and penalties. The only confirmed demand was Rs. 5,16,960/-, which the appellant had not contested. The decision emphasized the need for substantial evidence and proper investigation before drawing adverse inferences. The appellants were entitled to consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>