<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 631 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the refund claim for unutilized credit balance under Notification No. 30/2004-CE, ruling it as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of anticipating future duty levies, the Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory time limits, rejecting the appeal even beyond the general three-year limitation. The decision highlighted the significance of complying with prescribed time limits for refund claims, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 07:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 631 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the refund claim for unutilized credit balance under Notification No. 30/2004-CE, ruling it as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of anticipating future duty levies, the Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory time limits, rejecting the appeal even beyond the general three-year limitation. The decision highlighted the significance of complying with prescribed time limits for refund claims, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>