<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273282</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s decision in ITA 1413/M/2014, ruling that the Assessee was not liable for disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) due to inapplicability of retrospective amendments at the time of deduction. The cross objections in C.O. No.71/M/2014 were found infructuous. In ITA No.1414/M/2014 &amp;amp; CO No. 72/Mum/2014, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals and cross objections, aligning with its previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 07:20:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273282</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s decision in ITA 1413/M/2014, ruling that the Assessee was not liable for disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) due to inapplicability of retrospective amendments at the time of deduction. The cross objections in C.O. No.71/M/2014 were found infructuous. In ITA No.1414/M/2014 &amp;amp; CO No. 72/Mum/2014, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals and cross objections, aligning with its previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>