<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 184 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13347</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the surcharge under section 113 of the Income-tax Act was not applicable to block assessments conducted before the introduction of the relevant proviso on June 1, 2002. The Court relied on a precedent set by the Punjab and Haryana High Court and a previous decision of the same High Court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 184 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13347</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the surcharge under section 113 of the Income-tax Act was not applicable to block assessments conducted before the introduction of the relevant proviso on June 1, 2002. The Court relied on a precedent set by the Punjab and Haryana High Court and a previous decision of the same High Court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>