<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1198 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, ruling that additions cannot be made in non-abated assessments without incriminating material. The decision was based on the absence of such material, following established legal principles. Disallowances made without incriminating material were deleted, aligning with previous case law and emphasizing the necessity of seized material for adjustments to income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2018 07:20:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1198 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, ruling that additions cannot be made in non-abated assessments without incriminating material. The decision was based on the absence of such material, following established legal principles. Disallowances made without incriminating material were deleted, aligning with previous case law and emphasizing the necessity of seized material for adjustments to income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>