<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (10) TMI 72 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273276</link>
    <description>A statutory grant of proprietary rights in tenancy land under Section 11 was construed to transfer the landowner&#039;s entire right, title and interest in the land, including standing trees, because the expression was held wide enough to cover them absent a contrary intention. The Court read Section 11 consistently with Section 8 of the Transfer of Property Act, under which a transfer of land ordinarily includes trees standing on it. Section 84(a)(i) was treated as dealing with State acquisition and not as limiting Section 11. The contention that the trees were forest trees or too valuable to pass was rejected, and the writ relief below was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:04:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (10) TMI 72 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273276</link>
      <description>A statutory grant of proprietary rights in tenancy land under Section 11 was construed to transfer the landowner&#039;s entire right, title and interest in the land, including standing trees, because the expression was held wide enough to cover them absent a contrary intention. The Court read Section 11 consistently with Section 8 of the Transfer of Property Act, under which a transfer of land ordinarily includes trees standing on it. Section 84(a)(i) was treated as dealing with State acquisition and not as limiting Section 11. The contention that the trees were forest trees or too valuable to pass was rejected, and the writ relief below was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>