<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 621 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361794</link>
    <description>The Advance Ruling Authority rejected the application from M/s. Pon Pure Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. under Section 98(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, due to lack of jurisdiction. The issues raised regarding the &#039;place of supply&#039; were determined to fall within the Customs domain rather than under Goods and Services Tax purview, leading to the rejection at the admission stage without delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 621 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361794</link>
      <description>The Advance Ruling Authority rejected the application from M/s. Pon Pure Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. under Section 98(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, due to lack of jurisdiction. The issues raised regarding the &#039;place of supply&#039; were determined to fall within the Customs domain rather than under Goods and Services Tax purview, leading to the rejection at the admission stage without delving into the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>