<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 99 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13338</link>
    <description>The HC determined that the Tribunal erred in applying Rule 6DD(j) exceptions to the assessee&#039;s cash payments in unaccounted transactions. The assessee failed to prove the genuineness of payments and identity of payees, as required by Rule 6DD(j). Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 99 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13338</link>
      <description>The HC determined that the Tribunal erred in applying Rule 6DD(j) exceptions to the assessee&#039;s cash payments in unaccounted transactions. The assessee failed to prove the genuineness of payments and identity of payees, as required by Rule 6DD(j). Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, rejecting the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>