https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361785 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions totaling Rs. 108,78,211/- due to discrepancies in income, unsecured loans, unexplained cash deposits, and unverified expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of relying on genuine and verified documents for income additions, concluding that the AO's reliance on unauthenticated documents was unjustified. en-us Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361785 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions totaling Rs. 108,78,211/- due to discrepancies in income, unsecured loans, unexplained cash deposits, and unverified expenses. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of relying on genuine and verified documents for income additions, concluding that the AO's reliance on unauthenticated documents was unjustified. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361785