<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 600 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, reducing the disallowance percentage of inward carriage and loading/unloading charges from 15% to 6% and directing a fresh computation of the disallowed amount. The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the payments made, resulting in the disallowance being upheld at the appellate stage. The decision emphasized the unique circumstances of the case and should not serve as a precedent for future assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 600 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, reducing the disallowance percentage of inward carriage and loading/unloading charges from 15% to 6% and directing a fresh computation of the disallowed amount. The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the payments made, resulting in the disallowance being upheld at the appellate stage. The decision emphasized the unique circumstances of the case and should not serve as a precedent for future assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>