<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 588 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361761</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of reimbursable expenses in the context of service tax liability for clearing and forwarding services. It was determined that expenses unrelated to the core service provided should not be considered for service tax liability. The tribunal referenced legal precedents from higher courts, including a judgment by the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court and a subsequent decision by the Apex Court, to support this conclusion. As a result, the tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision, stating that including such reimbursable expenses in the consideration for service tax was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 06:59:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=523431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 588 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361761</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the interpretation of reimbursable expenses in the context of service tax liability for clearing and forwarding services. It was determined that expenses unrelated to the core service provided should not be considered for service tax liability. The tribunal referenced legal precedents from higher courts, including a judgment by the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court and a subsequent decision by the Apex Court, to support this conclusion. As a result, the tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision, stating that including such reimbursable expenses in the consideration for service tax was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=361761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>